The label of “geek” is one that has evolved over time. Where it was once a derogatory term for someone outside the norm, possibly stemming from the word’s Low German origin where it meant “fool” or “crazy”, it has now become the descriptor for a rich subculture that focuses on esoteric subjects marginal to the social mainstream. But is this where the evolution has stopped? I think not. I believe a newer breed of geek has more recently started emerging from the ranks. I believe the next generation in the development of the geek is already here: the post-geek.
The “post-“ appellation is an interesting label that has also grown over time. Often used in cultural circles, it is an indicator of the next generation in a particular movement where an intentional departure is made from the previous dominant aesthetic and philosophical approaches. As an example, post-rock is a form of progressive rock that uses the instruments of traditional rock music, but as facilitators of timbre and textures rather than riffs and power chords. In this vein, the post-geek is one who has stepped beyond the barriers of the geek subculture, openly embracing philosophies and aesthetics from a multitude of cultures.
But what is the post-geek subculture? At its core, it is a superset of the mainstream, geek, and indie subcultures. The mainstream is any mass media that is immediately socially acceptable, and distributed through traditional means. A geek is someone whose interests fall out of the purview of the mainstream, despite being a product of a traditional mass media system. Indie is the alternative to traditionally-created mass media, a way for people to make their own media without the shackles of old media due to new methods like digital distribution. The post-geek lies at the union of these three subcultures — someone who feeds off traditional and new media, who exists outside of the mainstream because they want to do what they love; someone who is not concerned about labels being barriers to their interests; someone who embraces tolerance and openness in themselves and others.
There are basically two types of post-geek. The first type are those that have come into it naturally; these tend to be members of the younger generations, the so-called internet generations. These people are highly connected with long-term or lifelong exposure to multiple communication and media technologies. They’ve grown up without the Cold War, and are the children of postmodernism and globalisation. This generation by nature embraces society without barriers, and as such, are comfortable basing themselves across multiple cultures and genres. They may self-identify as geeks, but are actually comfortable basing themselves in any culture they choose, while retaining interest in others. This is their native paradigm and little conscious thought is required to maintain their lifestyle.
The other type of post-geek are those who have intentionally made a choice to change their lifestyle and focus, and expand on both their world-knowledge and interests for their own personal betterment — call it the self-actualised path. A possible starting point for the new post-geek could be the discovery of a new interest outside of their core (e.g. a genre of music), leading to them embracing the subculture surrounding that interest, then expanding their search into more interests. Alternatively, there could be elements within their own subculture that have repulsed the potential post-geek into seeking out new interests in an act of disassociation.
So, why post-geek? Why not choose post-indie or post-mainstream as the label for this emerging subculture? Geek and indie have always been countercultures to the more traditional mainstream, and while indie has commonalities with the geek philosophies, the post-geek is really the next evolutionary step for the geek subculture. As with all cultures, there is a sour element of extremism in the heart of the geek world that is very likely one of the primary drivers for the development of the post-geek.
At face value, geeks are genial folk that like to have fun and are accepting of others, but there are those within the subculture that embrace tribalism and manifest its worst aspects. Sexist attitudes run rampant, reviling women for daring to have similar interests to the men. A sense of entitlement has led to significant hubris and questioning the rights or motivation of others. In short, this intense tribalism has created an internal counterculture of bullying, which is somewhat ironic, considering the number of geeks who were themselves bullied during their formative years. This bullying and tribalism is reaching a peak, and as such, there are those who are distancing themselves from these disruptive groups and any acceptance of them within the geek subculture. As this people have moved away, adaptive evolution has become a factor, leading to speciation and the subsequent emergence of the post-geek.
It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent that survives. It is the one that is the most adaptable to change.
- Charles Darwin
In closing, whether or not people choose to self-identify as post-geeks, it cannot be denied that they are already here in various shapes and forms. They are not the homo superior to the homo sapiens of the geek subculture; they are a divergent path in cultural evolution, possessing a different range of interests and openness to the new than their generational predecessors. At the end of the day, post-geek is another label to differentiate a group from others; it’s the members’ individual identities that really counts. Whether someone chooses to identify as a post-geek or remain within their current subculture, it is still their uniqueness that defines a person.
















I’ve definitely witnessed geek bullying firsthand. I guess it’s the desire for people who were bullied as kids to get some kind of karmic revenge by being able to bully others, but that kind of hazing is part of why most people don’t want to be geeks in the first place!
I like this “post-geek” idea, and I definitely see it in myself. Not indie enough for indie, not main enough for mainstream, not geeky enough or geek. The older I get, the less time I’m willing to devote to identifying with a particular sub-culture. Do you think that post-geek is geeks consciously deciding to accept mainstream and indie sensibilities, or does it happen naturally over time?
I think, for a good proportion of people, the move towards becoming a post-geek happens naturally — something that happens as they develop new interests outside of the geek world.
Myself, I was probably more of a traditional geek growing up. One day, I decided to try this band called Mogwai that Ian Rankin kept mentioning in his Rebus books, and from there, I developed a love of post-rock music, which expanded into indie music and multiple other genres. Combine that with other interests that I’ve picked up through my interactions on Twitter, and I find that I no longer obsess over some minor aspect of geekdom, but have become more of a generalist in my interests. Through social media, I’ve seen the same thing happening with others, and this is where this idea of the post-geek originated.
I think there will be some that make a conscious move away from being solely geek, if only to remove themselves from the bad image being created by the infighting that’s getting worse. This could be a sign of the geek subculture’s stagnation and imminent implosion.
It’s an interesting point: that there is a post-geek movement growing. However, the driving force seems to be the enhanced role of social sites and the internet that allow for open borders between various subcultures (I can have a “geek” website or blog on one tab, and an indie rock magazine’s website on another, and so on.) In this way, it’s more of a redefining of how we identify with subcultures and how the exclusivity – calling one main subculture or label home – is being modified so that we sit with an appendage in each corner.
Indeed. Since I joined Twitter et al several years ago, my range of interests has expanded almost exponentially. There are still the hardcore geeks who will obsessively discuss the one comic character until the end of days, but social media has definitely led to a shift of philosophies for quite a few others.
I like this article and the thought process behind it, but this is way, way too short. There’s GOLD in these here hills, and you are barely scratching the surface.
Thank you, good sir. I like to think of this as a starter for a conversation that I’d like to see happening in geek circles. Once the idea has been out there and fomenting for a while, then it may be possible to expand on the subject :-)
This is exactly the term I’ve been looking for to define the way I’ve been seeing the world and consuming media over the past few years. My motivations for rejecting Traditional Geek Culture are primarily social justice-motivated: as a woman, I’ve felt systematically rejected in one way or another (usually “othered” or treated like I’m different/idealized when I want to be treated like any other person). I haven’t felt comfortable calling myself a geek in a long, long time, even though most people would see me as a professional geek.